AssemblyAI vs Deepgram: Which Speech-to-Text API Handles Production Scale?

AssemblyAI and Deepgram are both enterprise speech-to-text platforms serving developers building voice applications.

However, Deepgram outperforms AssemblyAI with 30% lower Word Error Rate, up to 40× faster inference time, and 2.5× more affordable pricing for production workloads.

This article will help you evaluate the differences in accuracy, latency, deployment flexibility, and cost structure that become critical when choosing infrastructure that scales with production demands.

Deepgram’s performance advantage comes from infrastructure that eliminates the extra cloud hops and network latency that slow down cloud-only competitors. While AssemblyAI's broader language catalog appears impressive, its accuracy, speed, and deployment control are limited in real-world production environments.

Production speech-to-text decisions come down to three factors: transcript accuracy and speed, domain-specific language handling, and deployment flexibility. Deepgram delivers sub-300ms latency with 90%+ accuracy on specialized vocabularies, while AssemblyAI offers broader language coverage with cloud-only deployment.

Deepgram achieves a 30% lower WER compared to AssemblyAI on production workloads, with domain-tuned engines like Nova-3 Medical reaching 1% to 10% WER on specialized healthcare vocabularies. This difference is due to Deepgram’s custom model training that can optimize for industry jargon, regional accents, and unique speech patterns that generic models miss.

Deepgram's inference speed reaches up to 40× faster than standard cloud ASR services, delivering transcripts in under 300ms for streaming audio. AssemblyAI handles real-time transcription adequately for low-volume applications, but network latency can create perceptible delays that break voice agent conversations at enterprise scale.

Deepgram's custom model training delivers accuracy improvements through its domain-specific vocabulary optimization. Nova-3 Medical, for example, comes pretrained on millions of specialized conversations, understanding pharmaceutical names, clinical shorthand, and regulatory language. Runtime keyword prompting further improves this, adding up to 100 specialized terms during API calls without model retraining.

AssemblyAI offers entity detection that extracts codes or tickers from transcripts. While this is useful for post-processing analysis, it does not improve underlying transcription accuracy.

Deepgram ships in three deployment configurations: public cloud for rapid integration, private cloud inside AWS or Azure accounts, and on-premises via Docker or Kubernetes containers. This is vital for healthcare systems that need to keep protected health information within data centers while maintaining low latency and high accuracy.

On the other hand, AssemblyAI operates exclusively as cloud SaaS, preventing data residency control required by healthcare, financial, and government organizations.

Deepgram is best for organizations building production voice applications where real-time performance, deployment control, and specialized accuracy determine success.

AssemblyAI works best for teams that want straightforward API integration without infrastructure management. Their cloud-only deployment means you send audio over HTTP and get transcripts back with 5.65% to 6.7% WER, accurate enough for most content applications, though you'll still need human review for compliance-critical work in healthcare or legal contexts. And because AssemblyAI handles all infrastructure on the cloud, your engineering team can avoid GPU provisioning and Kubernetes complexity.

The platform makes sense when you need broad language coverage. With 99+ languages supported, you can serve global users without managing multiple vendor relationships or regional API endpoints.

Enterprise speech recognition comes down to three requirements: sub-300ms latency for natural conversation, deployment flexibility for compliance mandates, and domain accuracy that eliminates editing overhead.

Deepgram delivers 30% lower WER, processes thousands of simultaneous calls while maintaining latency, and offers flexible deployment options including on-premises installations for healthcare and financial institutions. Custom model training and runtime keyword prompting can adapt to specialized terminology without the generic approach that limits AssemblyAI's production accuracy.

AssemblyAI's 99+ language support and cloud-only architecture work for content applications and lower-volume use cases. But when enterprise requirements demand real-time performance, compliance controls, and specialized accuracy, Deepgram provides the production-grade infrastructure that scales with demand.

Start building with Deepgram today. Sign up for a free console account and get $200 in credits at.

Deepgram trains neural models on diverse, high-quality datasets spanning multiple industries, acoustic conditions, and speech patterns. Custom model training optimizes base models for customer-specific jargon, accents, and use cases. Runtime keyword prompting adds up to 100 specialized terms during inference without retraining delays.

Deepgram's containerized architecture deploys via Docker or Kubernetes within data centers or private clouds, keeping audio data behind corporate firewalls. On-premises deployments deliver identical latency and accuracy as cloud infrastructure, but through elastic microservices that scale horizontally. For organizations with HIPAA compliance, SOC 2 Type 2 auditing, and customer-controlled data residency requirements, this on-prem approach can address security requirements that cloud-only vendors can’t satisfy.

Deepgram's infrastructure processes speech more efficiently than generic cloud platforms. This lets Deepgram offer volume pricing with discounts that AssemblyAI's pay-as-you-go model can’t match.

Both platforms provide REST and WebSocket endpoints with Python and JavaScript SDKs enabling rapid prototyping. Teams can validate transcription quality and measure latency within hours using Deepgram's CLI tools and sample applications. Building production pipelines with proper authentication, error handling, and monitoring would take 1-2 weeks regardless of vendor choice.